Since LeBron announced his decision to “take [his] talents to South Beach” last Thursday night, I’ve seen a couple of different people pose questions to NBA pundits about the Cavs’ fate for next year. Specifically, how many games should we anticipate they’ll be able to win without James in the line-up?
The consensus answer from those pundits seems to be “not many.” Big surprise. Specifically, 30 wins seems to be about the best case scenario the pundits believe Cavs fans can hope for.
Of course, the pundits who were asked this question weren’t people who I would expect are using advanced statistics in their projections. I, on the other hand, anticipate that the team will be better than most of the rest of the people in the country would think, because I know how well many of the players on the roster rate in metrics that the average fan (and average pundit) aren’t considering. For instance, when the idea of Toronto signing-and-trading Chris Bosh to the Cavs was being heavily discussed, our buddy Chad Ford (one half of T.I.T.) made the point that the Cavs could potentially use the deal to unload a bad contract like…Anderson Varejao’s. Whereas we here at Mesa have regarded Andy as the Cavs’ second-best player since about 2006.
But since “better than these other guys think” still isn’t a good answer to “How good do you think the 2010-11 Cavs will be?”, I decided I would use Wins Produced Per 48 Minutes (WP48) to build a rough model that would spit out some actual numbers.
Here are the parameters I set:
- I can only use players who are actually under contract for next year
- I’m excluding Delonte because Chris Grant has all but said that he will be cut or traded prior to his contract becoming guaranteed early next month
- There is a total of 240 minutes per game to distribute among the roster, since 5 players have to be on the floor for 48 minutes (5 x 48 = 240)
- The starting 5 will be Mo at 1, Parker at 2, Moon at 3, Jamison at 4, Varejao at 5
- Each starter will average 36 minutes per game.
- JJ will be the 6th man, and will average 20 minutes per game
- Sebastian Telfair will be the “most likely to DNP” and will only average 4 minutes per game
- All of the other subs on the roster will average 9 minutes per game
- Each player will play all 82 games
If use each player’s WP48 from the 2009-10 season and the minutes-per-game assumptions above, we get the following projection.
Varejao = .179 WP48 x 36mpg x 82 games = 11 wins
Mo = .136 WP48 x 36mpg x 82 games = 8.4 wins
Moon = .131 WP48 x 36mpg x 82 games = 8.1 wins
Hickson = .123 WP48 x 20 mpg x 82 games = 4.2 wins
Gibson = .117 WP48 x 9 mpg x 82 games = 1.8 wins
Jamison = .115 WP48 x 36 mpg x 82 games = 7.1 wins
Parker = .103 WP48 x 36 mpg x 82 games = 6.3 wins
Powe = .097 WP48 x 9 mpg x 82 games = 1.5 wins
Green = .083 WP48 x 9 mpg x 82 games = 1.3 wins
Jawad = .069 WP48 x 9 mpg x 82 games = 1.1 wins
Telfair = .020 WP48 x 4 mpg x 82 games = 0.1 wins
TOTAL PROJECTED WINS PRODUCED BY 2010-11 CAVS: 51 wins
Now, supposedly the WP48 statistic only accounts for 80% of wins. If we assume that to be true, then we should adjust this 51-win total by dropping it 20%.
TOTAL ADJUSTED PROJECTED WINS PRODUCED BY 2010-11 CAVS: 41 wins
The problem here is that it’s flawed to assume that these players are going to be able to play the same way without LeBron that they did with LeBron. In that sense, it’s misleading to use their 2009-10 WP48 stats in a projection. It’s likely more accurate to use their career WP48 stats.
Admittedly, this revised model would still be a very rough one, since there are some players—Andy, Jawad, Boobie, Hickson, and Danny Green—who have played with LeBron for their entire NBA careers. But it’s the best we can do right now.
When we plug career WP48 stats into the model, we get these numbers:
Varejao = .156 WP48 x 36mpg x 82 = 9.6 wins
Mo = .095 WP48 x 36mpg x 82 = 5.8 wins
Moon = .122 WP48 x 36mpg x 82 = 7.5 wins
Hickson = .116 WP48 x 20 mpg x 82 = 4.0 wins
Gibson = .107 WP48 x 9 mpg x 82 = 1.6 wins
Jamison = .118 WP48 x 36 mpg x 82 = 7.3 wins
Parker = .100 WP48 x 36 mpg x 82 = 6.2 wins
Powe = .183 WP48 x 9 mpg x 82 = 2.8 wins
Green = .083 WP48 x 9 mpg x 82 = 1.7 wins
Jawad = .068 WP48 x 9 mpg x 82 = 1.0 wins
Telfair = .013 WP48 x 4 mpg x 82 = 0.1 wins
TOTAL PROJECTED WINS PRODUCED BY 2010-11 CAVS: 48 wins
Again, if we drop this “best case” number by 20%, we get something likely much closer to reality.
TOTAL ADJUSTED PROJECTED WINS PRODUCED BY 2010-11 CAVS: 38 wins
In short, WP48 suggests that the pundits are, as usual, low-balling the Cavs. It’s possible that the team could still be competing for the final playoff spot in the East next season, even if they made absolutely no adjustments to their roster. Granted, this would take a remarkable level of health and consistency from all players involved, but it’s not out of the question.
However, we’re undoubtedly going to see changes to the roster in the coming weeks. My personal hope is that those changes are geared toward making the team better in the long run rather than the short. But as it stands now, we should feel comfortable that the Cavs are not going to be a 15-win team. Cold comfort if you consider where we thought the team was only a few months ago, but the first step towards improvement is realism. Hopefully the front office agrees.
-T
(view comments)
