August 5, 2010
Lance Blanks & A Very Special Cavs Mystery

If you follow front office moves, you already know that today Cavs exec Lance  Blanks was hired away by Phoenix to be their new general manager. Blanks worked under Danny Ferry during his entire tenure as Cavs’ GM, along with the brief stint under Chris Grant after Ferry’s contract expired earlier this summer.

As someone who has staunchly defended the Cavs’ executives for the past several years, I find this to be an interesting moment. We all know that among most NBA fans and pundits, the perception of the franchise’s front office has been less than favorable for a long time. Ferry is still routinely blamed by the usual talking heads for hastening LeBron’s exit by trying to build a team with veteran rentals rather than young players. Practically every trade made or rumored trade NOT made has been another bullet for the critics. The consensus among the people with microphones—as well as the fans who listen to them without thinking on their own—is simple: the Cavs’ front office was a disaster. This has become Gospel.

And yet…other franchises keep offering jobs to Cavs execs!

After years as Assistant GM, Blanks—whose name only surfaced as a contender for the job last week—has now been hired away by a well-respected organization in the Suns. Danny Ferry was Paul Allen’s first choice to take over as GM of the Trailblazers about a month ago. Ferry declined, reportedly due to Allen’s similarities to Dan Gilbert in terms of the level of meddling he was capable of.  And lest we forget, Atlanta tried to hire current Cavs GM Chris Grant to be their General Manager back in 2008.  Grant declined the offer in order to stay with the Cavs as Assistant GM and VP of Basketball Operations.

Why on Earth would this happen? Well, there are three possibilities:

1) Danny Ferry secretly spent the past five years compiling a vast photo archive of owners around the league in compromising positions

2) Key decision-makers in other franchises are all complete morons who somehow managed to miss the Cavs’ execs’ obvious laundry list of bad decisions, dysfunction, and general instability that people like Bill Simmons and Chad Ford have been trumpeting for years, or…

3) Contrary to what those same scions of public opinion seem to believe, people who know basketball can see past the crap and have realized that the Cavs’ front office has consistently been pretty fucking good for a long time.

As you may guess, I happen to stand firmly in the camp #3.

One side note: Blanks’s ascension to the top post in Phoenix cements the fact that long time Spurs’ GM R.C. Buford is the Bill Parcells of NBA executives. Like Parcells, Buford’s former assistant staffers are dispersing to the highest decision-making positions in franchises around the league. Danny Ferry worked under Buford in San Antonio before being hired by Gilbert in Cleveland. Ferry brought Blanks with him from San Antonio, then promptly hired Grant away from Atlanta. Blanks has assumed the GM post in Phoenix, Grant has taken over in Cleveland, and Ferry will undoubtedly have another shot as soon as he wants it. Sam Presti worked under Buford for several years before being hired to run the Sonics, who of course then become Oklahoma City. A few weeks ago, Presti’s assistant GM Rich Cho was hired by Portland to be their new GM—the job Ferry turned down after yet another former Buford staffer, Kevin Pritchard, was fired from the job on draft night. Finally, New Orleans hired Dell Demps, another Buford disciple, away from San Antonio to assume the GM job in New Orleans. So if you count Grant thanks to his association with Ferry, 1 out of every 6 NBA teams is currently being headed by someone who can be traced back to Buford, with two former staffers (Ferry and Pritchard) having already been GMs. Pretty impressive, especially for a guy who styles himself like this.

Back to the real point.

On the one hand, I am sad to see Blanks go. His departure symbolizes the end of the brigade (Ferry, Grant, Blanks) who I came to place a great deal of trust in over the past several years. I may not have agreed with every move they made, but I also have read enough to know that some of those moves were more or less forced on them by LeBron via Dan Gilbert. I will always wonder what the team would’ve looked like had that trio been allowed to operate without restrictions, but I guess none of us will ever know. Though you can bet your ass that if I ever run into Ferry or Blanks in an airport like I did with Derek Anderson, I will go out of my way to thank them and inquire.

On the other hand, I am also very pleased to see Blanks go. Not because I wouldn’t he rather have stayed with the Cavs, but because the more success he, Danny Ferry, and other Cavs’ alumni have as the top execs in other cities, the harder it will be for ignorant critics to continue the myth that the teams’ failures during the LeBron era were the fault of the front office.

Best of luck in Phoenix, Lance. Thanks for your efforts here in C-Town. Keep fighting the good fight.

-T

April 3, 2010
Cavs / Hawks Bazooka Point

Tonight, a brief note about psychology.

For the tenth time in the past 11 games (including the playoffs), the Cavs beat Atlanta. For the third time this season, the Cavs beat Atlanta despite the Hawks getting a lead during the fourth quarter. For the first time this season, the Cavs beat Atlanta despite:

  • Not only missing both Shaq & Varejao, but also…
  • Still massacring Atlanta on the boards (+14 DRB, +5 ORB, +19 TRB)
  • Shooting a dismal 41.3% FG
  • Laboring to a weak 14 team assists
  • Shooting only 31.6% 3P
  • Losing the turnover battle (-3)

During the final minutes of the broadcast, Hubie Brown and Jon Barry discussed the eerie similarity between this contest and the teams’ previous two match-ups this year. Hubie’s take was that the Hawks have to feel good about themselves if they match up with the Cavs in the playoffs, because those first 3.5 quarters establish that they have the talent and the ability to compete. All they have to do is “clean up the 4th quarter” to start getting some Ws.

I don’t say this often, but I completely disagree with Hubie’s perspective on this issue.

Saying that the only thing a team has to do is clean up the fourth quarter is, to me, a little like saying that the only thing you have to do to sleep with the hottest girl in the bar is get her back to your bedroom. Is it true? Yes. But it’s also arguably the most difficult part of the entire equation.

Thanks to NBA TV, this is a brief, very basic snapshot of the series between these two teams since the 2008-9 season:

WINS:  Cavs 10 | Atlanta 1

PPG: Cavs 97.8 | Atlanta 87.5

FG%: Cavs 47.0% | Atlanta 42.2%

REB: Cavs 42.2 | Atlanta 35.2

The Cavs swept the Hawks out of the playoffs last year. Tonight, they came out victorious despite all of the injuries and tepid play I mentioned at the beginning of the post, and despite that the Hawks were completely healthy. 

The reality is that it’s entirely possible to damage a team’s psyche. At a certain point, the Hawks simply start to believe that they can’t outplay the Cavs when it matters—regardless of whether the “when” is the last 6 minutes of a regular season game or an entire playoff series. The other example that comes to mind is Game 5 of the 2007 ECF against Detroit, AKA LeBron’s 48 Special. That performance broke the Pistons mentally. Aftewards, I always believed that that particular Detroit team would never beat the Cavs in a game of consequence ever again. Game 6 backed me up, and the sweep of the Pistons in last year’s opening round of the playoffs still involved a hangover for guys like ‘Sheed, Prince, McDyess, Rip, and Maxiell.

Are the 2009-10 Hawks at that point? If not, I would argue that they’re damn close. One way to know for sure, though, will be if the Cavs go into Philips Arena and beat the Hawks on the last day of the season when LeBron and the other starters either DNP or get 1 quarter (or less) of PT. I don’t think that will happen, but even if it doesn’t, it also won’t reverse the psychological damage done by now.

So congrats to the Cavs, who didn’t just win a basketball game (and the #1 seed in the East), but also secured a distinct mental advantage over an opponent they may still see in the 2nd round of the playoffs.

-T