July 2, 2010
Liar’s Poker: Day 1 LBJ Free Agency Recap

By the time anyone reads this article, LeBron’s second day of free agency meetings will have begun. He’s scheduled to hold court with the Clippers and Heat today, then the Bulls and Cavs Saturday. But Thursday was all about the NY/NJ metropolitan area—and shockingly, all sources from inside the Knicks and Nets indicate the meetings went “extremely well.”

Pardon me if I’m not sweating yet. And pardon me again if I go on to say that none of you Cavs fans reading this post should be sweating either.

As we here at Mesa have pointed out multiple times over the course of the past few weeks (via Twitter and in columns), generating excitement about a business prospect during a meeting falls somewhere between “producing saliva” and “crapping” on the scale of difficulty. I’m not even denying that the excitement in the room for the Nets and Knicks was genuine. But the reality is that unless one of these other teams walk out of the LRMR offices with a verbal commitment from James, the emotion in the room during  a presentation is irrelevant.

Let’s also not forget that the pundits reporting about yesterday’s meetings were entirely basing their opinions on sources within the Nets and Knicks, most of whom probably weren’t even at the meetings in question. As a result, reporters and beat writers end up gushing in print about how great their chances of landing LeBron are—like this, for example. (Caveat: kudos to Rod Thorn for sounding like the voice of reasonable expectation in the midst of this blowjob of a report.)

Examining this situation rationally for a moment, consider this: what else are these partisan sources going to say? “You know, I gotta be honest, I thought our presentation sorta sucked”? “I’ll tell ya, LeBron seemed really disinterested”? “We couldn’t even get a meeting with Amar’e earlier than Monday and Rudy Gay already re-signed with Memphis. Why the hell would we have any chance at signing LeBron”? Something tells me that’s not going to fly if you want to remain employed by either of those organizations.

Second, what about any of LeBron’s media appearances since he was 16 would lead anyone to believe that he wouldn’t portray interest and enthusiasm in these meetings? Not only was the first of them led by one of his best friends and biggest role models, but this is a guy who declared that at one time or another he’s dreamed about playing for every team in the league, and that he’s been looking forward to this day (free agency) for four years. This is a mega-holiday for him. I’m convinced that today’s teams could give their presentations entirely in Korean, and LeBron would still be giddy.

Third, thanks to the information that’s out in the public realm about the Knicks’ presentation, I can say with knowledge that it was laughable. For starters, one of the supposed ringers the NYK brain trust brought in for the meeting was…Allan Houston, a guy whose greatest legacy in the league is as arguably the worst return on a max contract investment in NBA history. Houston missed a combined 94 regular season games in the 3rd and 4th seasons of that contract and retired before the start of the fifth. For that, the Knicks paid him over $20M per. My sources tell me that Donnie Walsh followed up his decision to include Houston in the meeting by flying to New Orleans to pitch the Saints’ brass on selling the Super Dome’s naming rights jointly to BP and FEMA.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, Forbes got a hold of an actual piece of the Knicks’ presentation—a slideshow by a marketing consultant called Interbrand that claims LeBron has the potential to gross $2 Billion (yes, that’s a ‘B’) by playing the rest of his career with the Knicks. At the very worst, his signature on a Knicks’ contract would give him a 48.6% chance of grossing at least $1 Billion.

As Forbes’s Steven Bertoni points out in the article, “the report is light on the details of its methodology.” Having gone through the slideshow personally, I concur. The results seem to be based on…well, nothing tangible, other than the fact that James Dolan cut them a check to come to a specific conclusion. Interbrand claims that the findings were determined via a battery of computers running career projections based on a variety of factors, but the overall vagueness of the presentation creates the distinct impression of junk science (or technically, junk math. I wouldn’t want to confuse my junk).

Even funnier, the unintended take-away from this preposterous slideshow is that staying in Cleveland is actually a much more profitable decision for LeBron than anyone would have ever anticipated. Interbrand’s “study” shows that James’s maximum lifetime value in Cleveland is $1.176B, his lifetime average value is $699M, and his chance at making a billion dollars stands at 1.3%. By comparison among the other non-Knicks franchises included in the model (Chicago and Miami), Chicago would offer him a slightly higher maximum lifetime value ($1.233B), but a lower average value ($689M) and lower probability of grossing his first billion (1.0%). Miami is a distant fourth in all categories. In short, Cleveland is pretty clearly his second-best option behind the bumbling carnival side show that is the Knicks.

Considering that Dolan paid for this presentation, he may have wanted to suggest that Interbrand skew the findings even further than they’re already skewed. Telling LeBron he has any chance of grossing over a billion dollars by staying in his hometown, which is widely acknowledged by now to be neck-and-neck with Chicago as his chosen destination, isn’t necessarily a tactic I’d have recommended. But then again, this is why the Knicks have been an NBA afterthought for most of the past decade.

I also love the fact that the Interbrand “study” finds that LeBron has a 0% chance of making a bill in Miami because of “lack of fan avidity,” i.e. because no one living in Miami gives a shit about the Heat. I think it may be the only nugget of truth in the entire slide show. But that’s neither here nor there.

My final point as to why Cavs fans should remain calm: Pat Riley’s grand plan for wooing LeBron is going down in flames. According to reliable sources (and common sense, my favorite of all sources), Riley’s strategy hinged on getting verbal commitments from both Wade and Bosh to come to Miami before meeting with LeBron. As of now, that has not happened. Considering that Wade met with the Bulls today, and Bosh has been tweeting like a jackass about his meetings with Houston and New Jersey (with other meetings scheduled), it seems highly unlikely that King Slickback will be able to make that pitch as planned. Without commitments from those two players, the Heat have to try to sell James on living at South Beach with Mario Chalmers and Michael “Every GM in the League Thinks I Might As Well Be Made of Uranium” Beasley. Not exactly a strong hand, especially considering that if past history is any indication, the Heat might just retire James’s jersey even if he never plays for them.

In short, I still believe that the Cavs’ faithful have nothing to fear from the tri-state area, and all signs point to Miami and the Clippers being non-factors. Which means it will all come down to Saturday. Chicago Vs. Cleveland. Only time will tell if Dan Gilbert comes out of that match-up as the ownership equivalent to Craig Ehlo. But for today, at least, I believe we can all rest easy.

-T

May 20, 2010
The Summer of Money - The Sign and Trade

The big buzz - amongst everyone who’s already determined LeBron James will leave Cleveland when he becomes a free agent on midnight of July 1st - is about the possibility of a sign and trade. While I think there is a significant chance James stays with the Cavaliers, I can’t fault people for wanting to talk about a sign and trade. It is at least progressive and forward thinking in the sense that it involves conversations about building for the future and maximizing assets in order to do so.

As we all know, after all, the Cavaliers have not won a title with LeBron in town. 

Assuming the projected $56.1M cap sticks and using salary numbers from HoopData, we can talk about which players might come back to Cleveland in a hypothetical sign and trade arrangement. Remember, since the Cavs are over the salary cap, the salaries going out / coming in must match within 125% + $100K. 

Before getting into this, I should say that if the Cavs tell James and his team that they’re open to a sign and trade, it opens the door for him to be dealt to any team in the NBA. For the sake of not letting things get out of control, however, I’ll stick to the teams with cap space for now. I’ll also assume that the Cavs wouldn’t be sending any other players out alongside James, although I’m willing to acknowledge that this could be rather unlikely.

Yes, I know this is cheating. 

These proposed trades are based on the notion that LeBron’s salary next season, in a max deal, will be $16.6M (105% of his current salary - 30% of the cap would be $16.83M, but we’ll stick with $16.6M). This means that the salary totals involved in the trade would have to fall between $16.6M and $20.85M. 

Chicago Bulls: $20.6M in cap space

Luol Deng: $11.3M
Kirk Hinrich: $9M 

And wow that would be a terrible deal. I like Deng more than a lot of people I know, but he’s owed money through 2014 and Hinrich is owed another $8M in the 2011-12 season. Neither player comes anywhere close to filling the gap that would be left by James (in fairness, no two players probably will), and both have bad contracts. 

The Bulls could throw Joakim Noah ($3.1M), Taj Gibson ($1.1M), and James Johnson ($1.7M) on top of Deng, but I doubt James goes to Chicago without Noah - unless he truly hates him - and I would consider Anderson Varejao Noah’s equal anyway. Taj Gibson is Glitch without the upside. 

Miami Heat: $41.5 in cap space

A sign and trade with the Heat is literally impossible unless Miami were to sign a player(s) who is not currently under contract, or a three team deal - maybe with a franchise that is under the cap - could be swung.

In other words, next.

Side note: Remember when there was a debate between Michael Beasley and Derek Rose for the #1 pick? I believe that if Chicago hadn’t won the lottery, Beasley would’ve went first, and Miami may have had a stronger two man core of Dwayne Wade and Rose to add to this offseason. Of course, they still would have had a two man core…

I maintain that Pat Riley did a disservice to Wade, to Miami, and to the NBA by tanking for the past three seasons - no matter what happens this offseason - but that’s another story for another day. 

New York Knicks: $34.5M in cap space

The Knicks are a semi-interesting case only because they open the door to one of the major conversations the Cavaliers front office will be having if it becomes clear James is steadfast on going to another team:

Is it better to get assets in a sign and trade or let James walk and focus on cap space in 2010 and/or 2011?

I bring this up because the Knicks would likely dangle Eddy Curry, who has one year left on his deal at $11.3M. The Knicks could also sign and trade David Lee, giving him to the Cavaliers along with Curry for a combined salary that would fall within the necessary limits. 

In this scenario, the Cavs could be in a position to get a quality player in Lee and cap space in 2011, which could be hampered by a lockout and will be governed by a new collective bargaining agreement. 

What no one knows is what free agency will look in 2011. Will it still be a relative gamble, where teams largely overpay for talent and run the risk of getting locked into bad contracts (Larry Hughes), or will it be restructured to be more favorable to the owners than to the players? 

While all of the signs point to the latter, no one can be certain. 

If the Cavaliers let (or force) LeBron to walk without a sign and trade, it will give them about $9.9M to play with in free agency this offseason. Right now I would be against the team signing anyone with that money because of the uncertainty surrounding the new CBA and the fact that star players come in the draft, not free agency. No one wants to hear this, but if LeBron leaves, the Cavs should be trying to get back into the lottery as soon as f’ing possible. 

New Jersey Nets: $26.3M in cap space

I touched on this with the Bulls, but the Nets provide something else for James to consider - is he willing to give up maximum money (by this I mean a 6 year deal) and leave without a sign and trade so that the team he’s going to is able to keep all of its assets? 

The numbers are close, for example, on the Nets giving the Cavaliers the following players for James: 

Devin Harris: $9M
Yi Jianlian: $4M
Terence Williams: $2.2M
Courtney Lee: $1.4M

But then LeBron has to go to a New Jersey team that no longer has a point guard who was once an all star. And who knows what kinds of draft picks the Cavs might be able to force out of their trading partner, as well. 

As many people have already written, we’re going to learn a lot about LeBron James in the window after July 1st. 

I’ll be back on Monday to write about more potential sign and trade options with different teams.

March 3, 2010
Cavs-Nets Bazooka Point

The game tonight was pretty fun to watch at times, which is all you can hope for as a fan of the Cavaliers (or of the Nets, for that matter). LeBron appeared to be in a bad mood, but that didn’t stop him from shooting 10-18 from the field, grabbing 7 rebounds, dishing out 14 assists (compared to only 3 turnovers), while adding 3 steals and a block.

The only real point I wanted to make about the game was that the Cavs’ numbers are probably going to be inflated over the course of the rest of the season because they’re playing at a faster pace without Shaq. 98.7 possessions per game (including one overtime game and not counting tonight) versus 93 possessions per game with Shaq (NBA average this season is 95.0).

So when JJ finishes games with 13 rebounds like he did tonight just keep that in mind.

As a side note, scoring is up this season overall in the NBA, which comes as a result of the entire league playing at a faster pace.

Finally, I’ve been forgetting to mention that Matt Barnes of the Orlando Magic tweeted me last Friday after his team blew a lead against the New Orleans Hornets. Read from the bottom up:

March 2, 2010
2010 Cap Reality Series: New Jersey Nets

With the Cavs set to square off against New Jersey Wednesday night, it seemed like an appropriate time to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of that franchise’s case for LeBron.

New Jersey’s biggest advantage—and I say this with complete seriousness—is part owner Jay-Z. Without a doubt, Jay is one of LeBron’s heroes (see: substitute father figures). For proof, all you have to do is go to the Twitter feed of Roots’ mastermind Questlove and read all about Bron’s presence at the show Jay did at MSG tonight. Bron’s relationship with Mr. Carter is well-documented, it’s strong, and it’s going to continue. And you can guarantee that the main reason Jay bought into the Nets was to fulfill the goal of one day getting LeBron on that team. This is a somewhat frightening prospect because historically, Jay-Z is a guy who gets what he wants (see: record sales, pop cultural significance, Beyonce).

Incoming Nets majority owner Mikhail Prokhorov is supposed to assist in this pursuit. He’s a man with resources, to be sure. Prokhorov was #40 on Forbes’s 2009 Billionaires list with an estimated net worth of $9.5B. If you want to believe all the hype, he will be irresistible to Bron because money will be no object. This applies to both salaries for his supporting cast and any off-hours excess that we can imagine. He’s going to be a whirlwind that sweeps through the NBA and blows away every other penny-hoarding owner. The Nets, in short, will be a juggernaut that LeBron will be powerless to resist.

There are only a few small problems with this outlook.

The first of these problems is that the 2009-10 Nets are still in danger of going down in infamy as the worst team in NBA history. Today, they stand at an embarrassing 6-53. Another 4 wins are needed to put them over the 9-73 basement floor installed by the 1972-73 Sixers. Strictly based on their pace so far, it seems unlikely that this will happen.

Even more troubling for the Nets, though, is that no one in the league is able to figure out WHY they’re 6-53. After trading Vince Carter, I doubt there were many NBA speculators out there penciling the Nets into the post-season. I doubt anyone would have been terribly impressed with your fortune-telling abilities if you’d predicted that they would be in last place in the Atlantic. But to be on pace to be historically bad? That’s an entirely different story.

The Nets roster is arguably less of a wasteland than the Knicks’. (For a recap of their players and next year’s salary commitments, see Hoop Data’s feature here.) Unlike Donnie Walsh’s squad, the most promising elements of that roster are all signed for next year, with salary cap space remaining above and beyond them. Though he’s been hurt at various times throughout this year, Devin Harris was selected as an All-Star reserve last season. Brook Lopez is one of the most promising and skilled young Centers in the game right now. And I think that we all remember Courtney Lee from last year. Those three guys on their own should be able to get the Nets to at least 13 wins this season. Yet the squad isn’t even halfway there, with only 23 games left to play.

Perhaps part of this can be blamed on their coaching situation. Lawrence Frank was dismissed early in the season. Kiki Vandeweghe stepped onto the sidelines to replace him…by all accounts, against his will. Kiki (I refuse to type out “Vandeweghe” more than twice in a post, and that right there was #2) will clearly be out of the coach’s seat next season, and Prokhorov will undoubtedly bring in a big name to take over. Unless they’re indeed able to bag Coach K before free agency begins, LeBron would be given free reign to choose his own coach as a part of the Nets’ offer. So any instability attributable to Kiki will be long gone.

The question is, will it really matter? As he’s stated many times, LeBron is all about winning. I didn’t always use to believe that, but I do now. Barring a complete disaster in the playoffs, the Cavs will at least get to the Eastern Conference Finals. Assuming that level of success, they’ll have made it to the ECF or farther in 3 of the last 4 seasons. If they make it to the Finals, that will be the second time in 4 years. To go from that level of consistent success to the team that will undoubtedly finish as the worst in basketball—and possibly the worst in the NBA’s existence—would paint LeBron as the biggest hypocrite in sports history. Which is exactly why this season is such a disaster for New Jersey.

The Heat are flirting with the possibility of barely missing the playoffs in the year heading into Dwyane Wade’s free agency, but at least they’re on the doorstep and will probably end up making it in, even if it’s just for another first round exit. The Knicks are a sorry excuse for a pro basketball team, but they at least have the lure of being able to sign another max guy alongside LeBron. (Much like I’ve said about Sam Presti in the past, it’s always more advantageous to be able to sell potential for greatness than actual results.) The Nets, however, have neither of these things going for them. The best they can hope for is to sell Bron on the idea that Devin Harris when healthy is an All-Star, and Brook Lopez will be there soon.

The immediate counter-punch to this idea comes back to the record. As Mike said yesterday, it’s illogical to argue that just because Mo is widely regarded among casual fans as the second-best player on a very good team, he deserves to be an All-Star. Rod Thorn or Prokhorov would argue that it’s illogical to assume that just because the best player(s) on their roster on a very bad team, it doesn’t mean that they are NOT All-Stars. But that case could be made a lot more forcefully if the team wasn’t on its way to being the losing-est team ever. As we often say in sports, great players—and even very good ones—find ways to win in close games. If the Nets are carrying two guys on their roster that they want to pitch as once-and-future All-Stars, then those guys have to be able to will their team past that all-time worst mark. So far, that hasn’t happened. And that’s a reality that, despite all of the Russian oil money and Jay-Z love, I don’t think Bron can dismiss.

The other major disaster for the Nets is that for the foreseeable future, the location in front of their name will remain “New Jersey.” Though a ground-breaking ceremony for the forthcoming Atlantic Yards project will be held in Brooklyn this month, the Nets recently announced plans to play at least the 2010-11 and 2011-12 seasons at the Prudential Center in Newark. Ownership’s hope is to have the new arena at Atlantic Yards ready for the 2012-13 season. That may or may not happen, given the usual delays that happen in massive construction projects—even those without the type of aggressive protest movement this one has swirling around it. There’s also the potential for more trouble, given that Bruce Ratner’s real estate development company is involved in an ongoing investigation for corruption.

One thing is for sure, though: the franchise’s current situation has provided Jay and Prokhorov the opportunity to show just how convincing they can really be. Have at it, gentlemen.

-T

February 9, 2010
Cavs / Nets Bazooka Point

Not a lot to latch onto in this one. The Cavs coasted to what I can only refer to as a non-blow-out against the Nets tonight.  Calling it a close game would be an overstatement, since after the Cavs reclaimed the lead in the 2nd quarter, they never gave it back, and I don’t believe the Nets ever got closer than 5 points, with that deficit coming in the 3rd quarter. But it wasn’t exactly one of the more inspiring performances of the season.

On the one hand, I can see people really bagging on the Cavs for this one. They didn’t manage to win by double digits despite being at home against a team that came into their building at an abominable 4-46. Lebron had to play all but 6 minutes. The Nets shot 51.4% overall, including 45.5% 3PT—all without starting PG Devin Harris or well-regarded back-up Chris Douglas-Roberts.

The performance of Coldstone’s crew *could* be seen as particularly disappointing since it’s the second consecutive game in which they’ve allowed an established crap team to stick around til the end of the game. Saturday’s match-up against the Knicks wasn’t exactly a signature win, as we all recall. So in all those senses, it’s not totally unjustified for cynics to squint their eyes a little after this one.

All that said…the Cavs shot 52.7%, outrebounded the Nets (albeit by only one TRB), handed out 27 AST on 39 FG, picked up 11 steals, and kept their TOs down to the single digits (9).  The bench scored 39 points, including a career-high 17 from Jawad on 50% FG and 3-5 3PT.  My usual source for advanced stat box scores hasn’t posted tonight’s yet, so I can’t confirm how many close-range baskets the Cavs scored. My impression is that the answer is “a lot.” So it’s not as if they played a poor offensive game (with the exception of Z, who shot a positively Arctic 1-10 from the floor). In fact, those look like the types of numbers you’d see in a blow-out.

Long story short, the Cavs just weren’t playing very hard on D. And I can’t really get upset with them about it, honestly. Again, the team they were playing was 4-46. It’s their next-to-last game before the All-Star break. And I would also argue that the Nets were having an anomalously good shooting night. (Find me the last time that Jarvis Hayes shot 50% 3PT, and let me know how many minutes of sorting through box scores it took. He’s averaging 25.4% on the year.) Plus, as we all know, every bad team in the league gets up to play the best.

And despite all that, the Cavs won by a comfortable 7 points. I would even argue that trying to look at how many minutes people played is a little deceptive, since I think they were going at less than maximum effort. Even if you don’t accept that point, the two main guys you’d want to look at weren’t really excessive. Bron played a whopping 3 minutes over his season average (38.7 min/gm) and Shaq played right at his average (23 min / gm).

Windhorst noted before the game that a lot of scouts in the league refer to scouting the Nets as “a night off” because they basically only run 3 plays. Hard to argue that the players should treat it differently, since I doubt they’re as obsessed with keeping their point differential as high as possible, unlike Mike and me.

The bigger question is:  how are they going to play against Orlando on Thursday night?  My guess is that they come out with the type of fire we’ve come to expect from them over the course of the past couple of months and win easily, even though all indications are that Delonte won’t be back on the floor until after the All-Star break. If they don’t, THEN it’ll be justified to take a few shots. But in the mean time…

Win streak: 12 games (best in the NBA this season).  Days to trade deadline: 9.

-T.