July 2, 2010
Liar’s Poker: Day 1 LBJ Free Agency Recap

By the time anyone reads this article, LeBron’s second day of free agency meetings will have begun. He’s scheduled to hold court with the Clippers and Heat today, then the Bulls and Cavs Saturday. But Thursday was all about the NY/NJ metropolitan area—and shockingly, all sources from inside the Knicks and Nets indicate the meetings went “extremely well.”

Pardon me if I’m not sweating yet. And pardon me again if I go on to say that none of you Cavs fans reading this post should be sweating either.

As we here at Mesa have pointed out multiple times over the course of the past few weeks (via Twitter and in columns), generating excitement about a business prospect during a meeting falls somewhere between “producing saliva” and “crapping” on the scale of difficulty. I’m not even denying that the excitement in the room for the Nets and Knicks was genuine. But the reality is that unless one of these other teams walk out of the LRMR offices with a verbal commitment from James, the emotion in the room during  a presentation is irrelevant.

Let’s also not forget that the pundits reporting about yesterday’s meetings were entirely basing their opinions on sources within the Nets and Knicks, most of whom probably weren’t even at the meetings in question. As a result, reporters and beat writers end up gushing in print about how great their chances of landing LeBron are—like this, for example. (Caveat: kudos to Rod Thorn for sounding like the voice of reasonable expectation in the midst of this blowjob of a report.)

Examining this situation rationally for a moment, consider this: what else are these partisan sources going to say? “You know, I gotta be honest, I thought our presentation sorta sucked”? “I’ll tell ya, LeBron seemed really disinterested”? “We couldn’t even get a meeting with Amar’e earlier than Monday and Rudy Gay already re-signed with Memphis. Why the hell would we have any chance at signing LeBron”? Something tells me that’s not going to fly if you want to remain employed by either of those organizations.

Second, what about any of LeBron’s media appearances since he was 16 would lead anyone to believe that he wouldn’t portray interest and enthusiasm in these meetings? Not only was the first of them led by one of his best friends and biggest role models, but this is a guy who declared that at one time or another he’s dreamed about playing for every team in the league, and that he’s been looking forward to this day (free agency) for four years. This is a mega-holiday for him. I’m convinced that today’s teams could give their presentations entirely in Korean, and LeBron would still be giddy.

Third, thanks to the information that’s out in the public realm about the Knicks’ presentation, I can say with knowledge that it was laughable. For starters, one of the supposed ringers the NYK brain trust brought in for the meeting was…Allan Houston, a guy whose greatest legacy in the league is as arguably the worst return on a max contract investment in NBA history. Houston missed a combined 94 regular season games in the 3rd and 4th seasons of that contract and retired before the start of the fifth. For that, the Knicks paid him over $20M per. My sources tell me that Donnie Walsh followed up his decision to include Houston in the meeting by flying to New Orleans to pitch the Saints’ brass on selling the Super Dome’s naming rights jointly to BP and FEMA.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, Forbes got a hold of an actual piece of the Knicks’ presentation—a slideshow by a marketing consultant called Interbrand that claims LeBron has the potential to gross $2 Billion (yes, that’s a ‘B’) by playing the rest of his career with the Knicks. At the very worst, his signature on a Knicks’ contract would give him a 48.6% chance of grossing at least $1 Billion.

As Forbes’s Steven Bertoni points out in the article, “the report is light on the details of its methodology.” Having gone through the slideshow personally, I concur. The results seem to be based on…well, nothing tangible, other than the fact that James Dolan cut them a check to come to a specific conclusion. Interbrand claims that the findings were determined via a battery of computers running career projections based on a variety of factors, but the overall vagueness of the presentation creates the distinct impression of junk science (or technically, junk math. I wouldn’t want to confuse my junk).

Even funnier, the unintended take-away from this preposterous slideshow is that staying in Cleveland is actually a much more profitable decision for LeBron than anyone would have ever anticipated. Interbrand’s “study” shows that James’s maximum lifetime value in Cleveland is $1.176B, his lifetime average value is $699M, and his chance at making a billion dollars stands at 1.3%. By comparison among the other non-Knicks franchises included in the model (Chicago and Miami), Chicago would offer him a slightly higher maximum lifetime value ($1.233B), but a lower average value ($689M) and lower probability of grossing his first billion (1.0%). Miami is a distant fourth in all categories. In short, Cleveland is pretty clearly his second-best option behind the bumbling carnival side show that is the Knicks.

Considering that Dolan paid for this presentation, he may have wanted to suggest that Interbrand skew the findings even further than they’re already skewed. Telling LeBron he has any chance of grossing over a billion dollars by staying in his hometown, which is widely acknowledged by now to be neck-and-neck with Chicago as his chosen destination, isn’t necessarily a tactic I’d have recommended. But then again, this is why the Knicks have been an NBA afterthought for most of the past decade.

I also love the fact that the Interbrand “study” finds that LeBron has a 0% chance of making a bill in Miami because of “lack of fan avidity,” i.e. because no one living in Miami gives a shit about the Heat. I think it may be the only nugget of truth in the entire slide show. But that’s neither here nor there.

My final point as to why Cavs fans should remain calm: Pat Riley’s grand plan for wooing LeBron is going down in flames. According to reliable sources (and common sense, my favorite of all sources), Riley’s strategy hinged on getting verbal commitments from both Wade and Bosh to come to Miami before meeting with LeBron. As of now, that has not happened. Considering that Wade met with the Bulls today, and Bosh has been tweeting like a jackass about his meetings with Houston and New Jersey (with other meetings scheduled), it seems highly unlikely that King Slickback will be able to make that pitch as planned. Without commitments from those two players, the Heat have to try to sell James on living at South Beach with Mario Chalmers and Michael “Every GM in the League Thinks I Might As Well Be Made of Uranium” Beasley. Not exactly a strong hand, especially considering that if past history is any indication, the Heat might just retire James’s jersey even if he never plays for them.

In short, I still believe that the Cavs’ faithful have nothing to fear from the tri-state area, and all signs point to Miami and the Clippers being non-factors. Which means it will all come down to Saturday. Chicago Vs. Cleveland. Only time will tell if Dan Gilbert comes out of that match-up as the ownership equivalent to Craig Ehlo. But for today, at least, I believe we can all rest easy.

-T

June 29, 2010
ESPN’s Free Agent Summit = Abyss of NBA Knowledge

Since the Cavs broke off contract talks with Brian Shaw earlier today, I have no real news to discuss right now. Instead, I’m going to take this time to address a half hour of TV that thousands of sports fans watched tonight—ESPN’s Free Agent Summit. Or, as I like to call it, “4 Guys Ignore Reality for 30 Minutes.”

In case you missed it, the show consisted of ESPN’s Tony Kornheiser, Mike Wilbon, Dan Lebatard, and Bill Simmons discussing the ins and outs of the Summer of Money. The problem is that apparently, none of them understand anything about the salary cap, let alone some basic things about the players involved. But what do you expect from a guy who, as far as I can tell, now only watches golf (Kornheiser); a guy who’s too busy being friends with the players and coaches to actually report on them objectively (Wilbon); a South Beach homer (Lebatard); and a reality TV scholar (Simmons).

It would take me all night to try to address every mistake or misconception this esteemed panel proclaimed, so instead I’ll just try to hit a few of the high points. It’s the best way I can think of to try to combat the dumbing down of American basketball fans.

1) It’s fiscally possible for LeBron, Wade, and Bosh to all play for Miami without anyone taking a pay cut

A max contract for the above players next season will be 105% of their 2009-10 salaries, or $16,568,908 according to cap sorcerer Larry Coon. Also per Coon, Miami will have $27,596,072 of cap space after re-signing Wade. That leaves Miami roughly $5.4MM away from being able to accommodate three max guys. Even if they manage to shed the radioactive Michael Beasley (guaranteed $4.9MM for 2010-11), they’re still short.

Further, a sign and trade isn’t possible because Miami doesn’t have the assets to match salaries for a third max contract. As of this moment, the only other players besides Beasley that are even on their roster are Mario Chalmers ($854,389), Joell Anthony ($885,120), and Kenny Hasbrouck ($762,195, unguaranteed). It may be possible via getting a third team involved, but what third team is going to want to help enable that deal? Oh, maybe the Wizards, since they seem to just want to help other teams clear cap space. But even that seems doubtful.

Bottom line: this scenario can play out, but only if one of the three stars voluntarily takes a pay cut. There’s a minimal chance of that happening with so many other teams willing to dish out max money.

2) Dirk Nowitzki should be the next player mentioned in all free agent talks (behind the guys mentioned above)

The amount of time that the panel spent on this topic was just remarkable to me. To Wilbon’s credit, he admitted what makes this subject so ridiculous: Dirk’s not going anywhere. His opt out just means he gets to negotiate a longer, higher-dollar extension with the Mavericks. This is the same scenario as with Paul Pierce, who opted out of the final year of his Boston contract tonight.

Beyond the dollars and cents aspect, I got a good laugh out of the notion that Dirk is such an important player that he should be in on the alleged face-to-face talks with Wade, James, and Bosh. Just think about that room for a second: the three supposedly tight-knit buddies in the primes of their careers…and then the 32 year-old German guy. For the record, Dirk would probably be a welcome presence in that room from a personality standpoint, since as far as I can tell he’s hilarious. But he’s not repped by CAA and can’t know any of those guys very well, let alone the fact that he’s on the complete opposite side of his career. It’s a little absurd.

Kornheiser really took the cake on this one. He predicted that Nowitzki would end up in Miami when it was all said and done. Frankly, I was surprised that Kornheiser was even aware that Miami had a franchise, but part of his reasoning for Dirk’s move may have been projecting how well he would fit alongside the likes of Rony Seikaly and Glen Rice. So I’m holding back the credit.

3) High quality veteran players will take the league minimum to play with a “Super Team”

I say this over and over again, but this is my favorite idea in the entire free agency discussion. I especially like it when pundits spout this minutes or seconds after declaring how ridiculous it is to think that in this crucial final year before the new CBA, the big-name free agents will opt for less money. I agree with that statement. But the notion that the little guys—the ones who aren’t making any endorsement money or getting any other major perks—are going to have a different mindset on the same issue is just unrealistic. 

Think about it: Tarence Kinsey and Dorell Wright—both low dollar role players in 2008-9—both got cited for traffic violations in Bentleys they’d bought that same season. It may be unfair to project that every guy in the league is living this far beyond his means, but I’m willing to bet that many of them are. Factor in their wives/girlfriends, kids, friends, and other expenses, and every dollar counts. Yes, chasing a championship is great, and some guys may take less money for the opportunity. But the notion that really high quality players who could easily command a bigger contract this summer—say, Ray Allen—are going to voluntarily opt for a veteran minimum contract…please.

4) The Nets will be shut out in free agency because “if you want to play in New York, why would you want to play for a team that stinks?”

Yes, the Nets were the worst team in the league last season with an abysmal 12-70 record. But they have the highly productive Brook Lopez, #3 pick Derrick Favors, and former All-Star Devin Harris. The Knicks were 29-53, traded their first round pick to the Rockets at last season’s deadline, and will lose their most productive player, David Lee, to free agency so they can clear cap space to chase a bigger star.

Bottom line: the Knicks had more than twice as many wins as the Nets last season, but they were still sub-30 wins. Does that mean they’re good, or just good by comparison? Plus, when you take the cool factor into account (Nets: charismatic billionaire owner, Jay-Z, upcoming Brooklyn move vs. Knicks: incompetent owner, decaying MSG as home floor), the Nets have to be considered a more appealing option. But maybe that’s just me. 

5) LeBron will skyrocket to multiple titles as soon as he changes teams, because he’ll “finally have a say in who his teammates are”

A lot of preposterous comments were made tonight. But this one, from the Miami Herald’s Dan LeBatard (whom I normally like), may have been the crown jewel. I really wish that Woj had been able to call into the show so he could set the record straight on this, but obviously it didn’t happen.

If the reports that came out at the end of this season were true—and I have every reason to believe they were—no single player in NBA history has had as much say in the roster around him as LeBron James. We know that LeBron approved the Shaq trade. He supposedly told the front office to go out and get Antawn Jamison mid-season. Multiple deals that Ferry had constructed were allegedly vetoed by James, and thus, by Dan Gilbert. To blame Ferry for the failures of the roster is a near-preposterous exercise.

In fact, if LeBron does end up winning a title or titles with a team such as Miami or Chicago, it will be precisely because he does NOT have a say in who his teammates are (beyond the obvious initial choice made by the switch itself). If Riley couldn’t be strong-armed by Wade, he won’t be strong-armed by LeBron. And if Jerry Reinsdorf couldn’t be strong-armed by MJ, he won’t be strong-armed by LeBron. For James, an iron-willed owner and/or team president may be the best thing. The question is whether or not that’s what he really wants.

I could go on forever about more topics. For instance, the “summit” spent an entire segment analyzing who would be a better pick-up between Shaq, AI, Jermaine O’Neal, and Tracy McGrady, but the phrase “sign and trade” never came up a single time in any of the talk of the marquee free agents. However, I have better things to do with my life than continue to talk about all the ways in which the mainstream sports media once again missed the boat.

My advice: til signatures start going on contracts, believe half of what you see and none of what you hear. Especially if Kornheiser, Wilbon, Lebatard, or Simmons is involved. Good night and good luck.

-T

February 23, 2010
2010 Cap Reality Series: Miami Heat

Now that we’ve all been able to recover from the fury of the trade deadline, I wanted to try to sort through what this summer may look like.

I’m referring, of course, to free agency. Which is not a topic that I normally like to think about. I’m the type of person who can go down the rabbit hole if he starts dealing with a situation where too many unanswerable “what ifs” are in play. As I stated on this blog about a week ago, I was almost more concerned over whether or not the Knicks were able to clear enough cap space to sign two max free agents than I was about the Cavs’ getting Jamison.

And yet, here I am…

I’m not the only one thinking about this topic, obviously. Mike already posted a link to ESPN’s breakdown of the franchises in play in this upcoming free agent season. Brian Windhorst wrote an article about the inherent gamble involved in staking your team’s future on free agency in the PD this Sunday. (Worth a read if you haven’t seen it already.)

I’m not entirely on board with some of the specifics that B-Dub uses—for instance, citing Gilbert Arenas as a positive pick-up for the Wiz seems dubious, especially since he then goes on to call Carlos Boozer a disappointment to the Jazz. But I do agree with the general sentiment. As I’ve said before, cap space is pressure. If a front office whiffs on the guys actually worth the money, they are automatically in peril of overpaying someone undeserving just so they can argue to the fan base that they got something for the money and the sacrifice it took to earn that money. Hence, the 2005 Larry Hughes signing after Ferry couldn’t convince Ray Allen or Mike Redd to walk away from re-signing with their then-current teams.

With all that in mind, though, I haven’t yet seen an honest, in-depth breakdown of the pros and cons going for each of these franchises who have cleared the cap space to make a run at LeBron this summer. So over the course of the next week or two, I’m going to do it team-by-team. Starting with…

CONTESTANT #1: THE MIAMI HEAT

*Note: I am going to run w/the assumption of a $53M cap and therefore a max contract value of $16.56M in the first year, but all of the analysis in this series could be rendered moot if the cap comes in higher or lower than that figure.

The Sell Job: In many regards, it could be argued that Miami is the most dangerous of the suitors vying for Bron. Players love South Beach and warm weather climates in general. Unlike some of the other potential free agent destinations, the Heat are a perennial playoff team. The young players still likely to be on the roster—Michael Beasley, Daequan Cook, and Mario Chalmers—have talent. Also unlike New York, the Heat have draft picks and will be far enough under the cap that they will NOT have to fill out their roster entirely with minimum salary players. Wade and Bron are close friends, and the lure of playing together every game is tantalizing. Pat Riley has built a championship team as recently as 2006, and the man is a legend of the game that a young stud like LeBron would naturally gravitate toward as a mentor figure. With the right roster, he could even come down from the box and back to the bench.

The Reality: Though not as much of a desert as New York (who I’ll look at on Wednesday), the Heat’s roster—other than Wade—is hardly one to motivate a smart player to jump ship from a contender. Beasley has talent (averaging 19 PTS/ 7.8 REB per 36 on 48% shooting), but has also had off-court troubles. With the exception of FT%, STL, and TOV, his per-36 numbers in his second season have either plateaued or declined. Cook won a three-point contest a year ago, but is only averaging 37% 3FG and a dismal 36% FG overall for his career. Chalmers, meanwhile, is the guy who chucked up a half court shot in the middle of a 4th quarter run by the Cavs last year because he thought a non-existent TO had been called. Apart from that, he’s only getting 25 minutes of playing time per game this year, though his per 36 stats aren’t…well, they’re not good (11.1 PTS on 42.6% FG / 5.4 AST / 2.3 TOV).

Then there’s the Alpha Dog issue. If Bron goes to Miami—which has been Wade’s team for the past 7 seasons—how does that work out? Officially, Wade is a shooting guard and Bron is a forward. But in terms of how frequently they want the ball in their own hands on the perimeter, they essentially play the same position.  Bron is clearly not ready to make a living posting up, mostly because he doesn’t want to. So would he be able to co-exist with Wade on the same team? Probably. But I don’t know that he’d love it long-term.

Meanwhile, Wade has even said himself that if he could play with anyone in the league, he’d choose Da-wight over Bron. Considering that Wade won a title by combining with a powerhouse inside presence, this should shock absolutely no one. It’s also not a coincidence that Riley’s primary trade targets in the past two seasons have both been big men—Carlos Boozer and Amar’e Stoudemire.

What about the lure of South Beach? There are a lot of players in this league that this venue would make a difference to. I don’t necessarily think Bron is one of them. Though I’m sure he’s not a clergyman in his off-hours, I feel comfortable saying that Bron’s priorities are truly winning, improving his game, and building himself into a global brand. The idea that he’d immediately flip for the opportunity to play in Miami so that he can hang out in South Beach is ludicrous. Look, if the guy wants to go to the beach, he can charter a plane and be there in a few hours. If he wants prime night life, he can be in New York or Vegas or LA just as easily. If he wants beautiful Cuban women, I’m willing to bet that he can have them flown in via a quick phone call to World Wide Wes or Maverick Carter. But the idea that the commute to the beach is going to be a major factor in LeBron’s decision-making on where to play is just incredibly naive to me.

Then there’s the great Pat Riley.

Yes, the man is a basketball legend. Yes, he’s won multiple titles as a Hall of Fame coach and GM. But look at how the team has done since winning the 2006 championship:

2007: 44-38, swept by Chicago in first round of playoffs.

2008: 16-57, worst record in the NBA.

2009: 43-39, L to Atlanta in first round of playoffs.

2009-10: today, the Heat has a 29-28 record and will have to fight like hell to hang onto the 8th seed in the playoffs, where they will undoubtedly be bounced in the first round yet again.

This leaves their cumulative record since 2006 at a sobering 132-162. The franchise has died in the first round of the post-season twice, missed it entirely once, and will do either one of those or the other again this year. Since dealing Shaq to the Suns in 2008, the biggest-name running mate that Riley has given Wade in Miami has been either a past-his-prime Shawn Marion or Jermaine O’Neal, who by this point has had more operations than Frankenstein’s monster. (If I had to guess, Wade’s most productive teammate in terms of advanced stats has probably been Udonis Haslem, who the Heat will likely not retain when his contract expires this summer.) I don’t normally argue for the merit of big names, but in this case, it’s not as if Riley can point to the franchise’s record over the past 4 seasons and argue with a straight face that he’s complemented Wade with quality role players.

Of course, Wade and Riley have been in a protracted staring contest over the roster for years now. Their owner is widely renowned as one of the cheapest in the league. Compare that to what Bron has gotten from Danny Ferry and Dan Gilbert.

Then there’s the issue of draft picks. Yes, the Heat have two in the first round (one of their own and one from Toronto from the Jermaine O’Neal trade). But barring a total shift in those teams’ outlook for the rest of this season, both will be mid-rounders. And it’s not as if Riley has exactly been setting the world on fire with his draft prowess since plucking Wade at #5 in 2003. Yes, Beasley is a potential complementary piece, but it was pre-ordained that whomever ended up with the #2 pick last year was going to take him. It’s not as if Riley did some clandestine research to uncover an unknown gem. Meanwhile, the other players he’s drafted since Wade are as follows:

2003: Jerome Beasley (#33 overall)

2004: Dorell Wright (#19) and Pape Snow (#47)

2005: Wayne Simien (#29)

2006: no picks

2007: Jason Smith (#20) and Stanko Barac (#39)

2008: Michael Beasley (#2) and Darnell Jackson (#52, traded to Cavs)

2009: Marcus Thornton (#43) and Robert Dozier (#60)

I rest my case.

Finally, there’s the cap space itself. Under the assumption of a $53M cap, the first year of a max contract for a player w/Bron’s or Wade’s tenure would be $16.56M. So two maxes = $33.12M. Beasley, Cook, and the team option on Chalmer’s combine for ~$8M. Two mid-first rounders, according to ESPN, maths out to another $2.5M total. This all adds up to $43.62M, which leaves the Heat with ~$9.5M to fill out the other 5 roster spots required to get to the minimum 12. According to the NBA minimum salary scale, that leaves the Heat with some room to get creative—but not much. They will mostly have to rely on other players taking lower salaries for the opportunity to play with their imagined two max contracts, which may or may not be realistic.

Add all this up, and what do you get? A middle of the road roster that is going to have to rely on players choosing winning over money to fill out into complementary shape. A geographical / off-hours destination that probably doesn’t matter all that much to the guy in question. A GM with weak draft skills and an ego that will motivate him to play hardball with the only player keeping his franchise from contraction, even to the extent that he will completely waste 4 years of that player’s prime to prove a point. A star player basically already occupying the position Bron is used to manning. And to top it off, he wouldn’t even be able to wear #23 because Riley decided to retire the number of a competing player in his own arena’s rafters.

Prediction: Miami signs Amar’e and Wade to max deals, condemning the franchise to an annual #4 seed and at best, a single conference finals appearance after both players battle injuries for the remainder of their careers.

Series to be continued.

-T.