July 14, 2010
Cavs Round-Up

There are two different Cavs-centric topics that I felt needed to be addressed in some capacity tonight.

1) Goodbye Z, You Were Never Even Allowed To…Oh, You Did Everything But Win It All

I don’t have a lot to say here, other than that Z is the only reason to not resent the 20010-11 Miami Heat. In my personal opinion, it’s ridiculous to begrudge Z for making this move. He’s played for the Cavs for 14 years and even came back after a pride-stinging trade to the Wizards this past season. If the Heat do in fact win the title this year or next (early reports were that Z’s contract with Miami included a player option for the 2011-12 season), I will take consolation in the notion that Z will have finally won his ring. Admittedly, I will still wish that ring had a Cavaliers logo on it. But especially since he has already stated that he hopes to become a part of the Cavs organization after he retires, we here at Mesa wish Z the best.

2) “Who the Fuck is Kyle Lowry?”

Those of you who saw that the Cavs made their first move of the free agency period by signing Rockets back-up point guard Kyle Lowry to an offer sheet may be asking exactly that question.

The answer is: one of the best PGs most of you have never heard of.

First off, any time the Cavs acquire or attempt to acquire a player from Houston, you should automatically feel like it’s a good choice. Rockets GM Daryl Morey is arguably the most advanced stats-centric executive in the league. If you like our perspective on things, you like Morey’s perspective on things.

Lowry is one of those players that the Cavs have had their eye on for years. I remember rumors that they were trying to acquire him dating as far back as his playing days in Memphis, which ended midway through the 2008-9 season. Though not a tall player (listed at 6’ even), he’s not a pushover by any means (175 lb). More importantly, he has been arguably one of the best defensive 1s in the league for the past 4 years. Though my usual source for RAPM doesn’t seem to be loading tonight for some reason, it appears that his 4 year aggregate defense RAPM is right around -2, which is excellent (remember, negative numbers are good in defensive RAPM).

Further, Lowry is a disgustingly good rebounder for his position. Here’s what Mesa favorite Tom Haberstroh had to say about him at the beginning of the free agent season:

To the casual fan, Lowry might seem like another ordinary backup at the point. The 24-year-old former Villanova guard plays like a bulldog, using his rare combination of strength and quickness to overpower his lighter opponents. And he’s one of the best, if not the best, rebounding point guards in the NBA, as his 8.6 percent rebounding rate (percentage of available rebounds a player collects while on the floor) places him second at the position just behind all-timer Jason Kidd. Lowry, who’s just 6 feet tall, may even go down as the best vertically challenged rebounder in the history of the game.

Lowry also does the little things that aren’t captured in the box score. According to Hoopdata.com, Lowry took more charges (51) than any other guard this past season despite playing only 24.3 minutes per game.

The down-side is that Lowry isn’t exactly a scoring juggernaut. He doesn’t shoot particularly well—only 42.1% FG and 26.4% 3P career—but he’s also far from a liability. His True Shooting Percentage (the metric that takes into account 2P, 3P, and FT) is just shy of 54% career; barring an anomalous 2nd year, he’s been over 80% FT for his career. Most importantly, he gets to the line a TON for a point guard. Per 36 minutes, Lowry has averaged 5.7 FTA career. In comparison, Rajon Rondo has averaged only 3.4 FTA career.

Just as importantly, Lowry’s passing game is impressive. His 2009-10 Assist Rate (number of assists per 100 possessions) was 30.52. By comparison, one LeBron James’s 2009-10 AR was 23.42.

Overall, Lowry is a tough, gritty defender; an average shooter, but also a player who knows that his best asset is to attack the rim; and a more than capable passer. In short, he’s exactly the type of addition I would like to see the Cavs make to their backcourt, especially if Byron Scott’s “run on offense / lock down on defense” strategy is going to come to fruition. 

Before I get too excited, I should note that the Rockets have stated that they will match any offer sheet to Lowry in free-agency. So we’ll have to wait 7 days to find out if he’s actually coming to Cleveland. But if he is, I personally will be thrilled.

-T

February 9, 2010
What’s The Psychology of Danny Ferry Going Into The Trade Deadline?

If we haven’t said the words out loud, most of us have thought about it: Do the Cavs need to make a trade in order to win the championship?

I’ve offered implicit clues as to what my opinion on this subject is since the season started in October.

To recap:

The Cavs are the #1 seed in the entire NBA and have the best point differential of anyone in the league (+7.38). This means that, as of today, they have a very good chance to win the championship. Somewhere less than 25% but as far as chances to win championships go, that’s about as good as it’s going to get.

The Cavs also look good match-up wise against the Lakers and the Hawks. It’s hard to argue definitively one way or another when it comes to the Celtics and the Magic, given the fact that the Cavs have only played each of those teams once, but the Celtics look very old. The Magic still concern me, although they have weaknesses - poor guard play (so far) and no team leader, to name two; we may have a better sense come Friday morning, after Thursday night’s contest on TNT has gone one way or the other.

I’ve noted previously, as well, that I would feel more comfortable with the shape of the team going into the playoffs if they had an extra high-efficiency scorer. This stems from Mo’s streakiness, the average to below average production of the rest of the starting line-up, and the poor adjusted +/- numbers of everyone besides LeBron and Andy.

These stats, of course, can improve as the season goes along. But right now this team is built around LeBron as commander-in-chief; he’s so great that the other guys only have to be decent … and right now, that may actually be the best way to keep LeBron in sync. I suspect it’s how he likes it.

Having said all of that, it’s obviously more important to peer inside the mind of Danny Ferry and consider what he’s thinking. Nobody in the Cavs organization gives a shit about what I think, after all. Nor should they. So here’s a rundown of Ferry’s major considerations as he approaches the deadline…

  • If Z is traded, will he and his agent negotiate a buyout with the receiving team and come back to Cleveland in 30 days?
  • Am I okay with allowing one of my biggest assets - Z’s expiring contract - to vanish after the season? Taking his money off the books won’t bring my team underneath the salary cap this summer.
  • If I have to, will I give up J.J. Hickson now - who could be two or three years away from reaching his potential - to acquire championship-level talent?
  • Can I go to my owner and ask him to take on money now for a player who will either be overpaid under the new Collective Bargaining Agreement (which, barring a lockout, will start in 2011), or will potential kill my team’s salary structure if the league moves from a soft cap to a hard cap?
  • Will I be the GM of the Cavaliers at the start of next season?

Notice that I didn’t include, “Will LeBron James be a Cavalier in 2010-11?” This is because the ramifications of Bron not re-signing with the Cavs this summer would be gargantuan, not just for the team, but for the entire organization. At that point, Ferry would essentially have to go to the nuclear option anyway - meaning every bet in the universe would be off.

I can only come up with hypothetical answers to these questions, of course. But here goes, using what I believe is solid logic.

The Z buyout issue is dicey, given Z’s spat earlier in the year with Coldstone over his pseudo-benching in the record-breaking game against the Mavericks and the uncertainty involved with relying on one of your competitors, i.e. the team that Z would be traded to, trustworthily revealing whether or not they would try to buy Z out.

This is, ultimately, an unknown, even for Ferry, since buyouts can’t be negotiated prior to trades. I have to believe, however, that Ferry won’t move Z unless he’d bet his life that he’ll come back - the Cavs desperately need his length for likely match-ups in the playoffs.

The idea of losing Z’s contract as an asset at the end of this season is also complicated. Teams only have so many opportunities to use cap space, and when you’re paying the luxury tax, your version of free agency is trading expiring contracts. I think that Ferry has to feel like he could possibly create some sign-and-trade options this summer (by using assets like Mo, Danny Green, Boobie, Anthony Parker, Jamario Moon, even Christian Eyenga), but there’s no doubt that the biggest, simplest asset is Z’s contract - and it’s in the chamber right now. The clock is ticking. You don’t have forever to fire it.

As for JJ, when you’re the GM of a team that’s playing for a championship, you never think about what a player might become in three years, not if you can get a player that you know is better than him right now. This one, to me, is easy - Hickson is gone if it becomes necessary.

The issue of the new CBA is a big one … but it’s completely surrounded by uncertainty, especially since Ric Bucher recently reported that the owners’ pitch actually has a clause in it that would not allow old contracts to be grandfathered in. Essentially, what this means, is that salaries negotiated under the current CBA would be revised to fit into the salary structure of the new CBA. In other words, contracts like Andre Iguodala’s - which has 4 years and about $62M left on it - would become much less of an issue because they would be reduced.

In fact, it’s that word - uncertainty - that has to rule the day for Ferry, particularly since he’s not under contract for next season. I don’t know if this has something to do with LeBron’s pending free agency - would Ferry not want to be in Cleveland if he doesn’t have LeBron? If Ferry isn’t given an extension by the end of the season, would the Cavs even have a GM when LeBron becomes a free agent (I don’t know how far out, in terms of which day of which month, Ferry’s contract runs)? Maybe it’s up to Dan Gilbert, who could want to fire Ferry if he isn’t able to keep LeBron in Cleveland (I know one thing, Gilbert would probably prefer to pay a lot less for a GM in that situation).

The bottomline is that nothing is certain. Nothing can be predicted. And within that framework, Danny Ferry has to make a decision to trade or not to trade.

The only thing we can bet on for sure is that if Ferry believes a trade can be made that will increase the Cavs’ chances of winning a championship this year, then a deal is going to get made. As I said earlier, teams don’t get to play for championships forever - you do everything you can to try and get one when you have a shot.

And those are the parameters that I think will dictate whether or not we see “Cavs trade Z for…” on Twitter prior to February 18th.